The Prestige Economy of Academia
Helsinki. 5th November 2015.
Dr. Martin Paul Eve, Birkbeck, University of London
Why do we publish humanities research?
To be read. To be assessed. To collaborate?
Dissemination: Quality Control, Validation and Space-Time Compression
- Dissemination of work
- Preservation of record
- Footnotes and scholarly genealogy (vs. science?)
- Labour of reading: reading-avoidance techniques
- Dissemination at a distance
- Difference to conferences?
Assessment
The Symbolic Economy Maps onto the Real Economy
Reading and assessment are in conflict
- Drive to produce ever more work
- Hyper-inflationary price increases
- Micro-monopolies
- New forms don't fit
Dual crises of supply and demand
For assessment to work, we must restrict publication volume to size of academic job market: predicated on teaching
Three Problems
Problem 2: Public access
- Increasingly educated populace
- Institutional missions to benefit society
- The academy becomes irrelevant
- Especially the humanities
Problem 3: Restrictive Re-Use Rights
- Photocopying licenses
- Text mining/derivatives prohibited
- Inclusion in Wikipedia and other resources
- Community translation
Open Access (OA)
- Peer-reviewed research
- Free to read online
- Permission to re-use
- Gold: at publisher/source
- Green: institutional/subject repository
- Gratis: free to read
- Libre: free to re-use
Background image © PLOS. Used under a CC BY-SA 3.0 license.
But the prestige economy makes collaborating harder
- Culture of scarcity-thinking
- In a digital world of abundance
- Slow evolution of assessment paradigms
- Rhetoric of "Excellence"
- Individualist thinking (paper authorship in Big Science)
Abstract idea of "collaboration"
- "We want to collaborate"
- But on what?
- Institutional affiliation/pressure
- Authorship as proxy for activity
- But there is hope...
The End
Thank you!
Presentation licensed under a CC BY-SA 3.0 license. All institutional images excluded from CC license.
Available to view online at http://meve.io/FinlandWorkshop2015.