Thomas, Michael S.C. and McClelland, J.L. and Richardson, Fiona M. and Shapiro, A.C. and Baughman, Frank D. (2009) Dynamic and connectionist approaches to development: toward a future of mutually beneficial co-evolution. In: Spencer, J. (ed.) Toward a Unified Theory of Development: Connectionism and Dynamic System Theory Re-Considered. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195300598.Full text not available from this repository.
A tension has existed between connectionism and dynamic systems theory (DST), and this chapter considers why this should be the case. The chapter argues that much of the tension arises from a tenet that the two approaches share: they both rely on the explicit, quantitative instantiation of ideas in mathematical or computational models. The use of such models is responsible for much of the theoretical progress generated by connectionism and DST beyond the theories of good old-fashioned cognitive development (GOFCD). But the use of explicit, quantitative models brings with it a new set of problems. The chapter discusses several consequences of the use of such models and considers three points of apparent disagreement between connectionism and DST.
|Item Type:||Book Section|
|Keyword(s) / Subject(s):||connectionism, dynamic systems theory, good old-fashioned cognitive development, computational models|
|School:||Birkbeck Schools and Research Centres > School of Science > Psychological Sciences|
|Research Centre:||Birkbeck Knowledge Lab, Brain and Cognitive Development, Centre for (CBCD)|
|Date Deposited:||21 Mar 2011 09:02|
|Last Modified:||02 Dec 2016 13:41|
Archive Staff Only (login required)