BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Contrast classes and matching bias as explanations of the effects of negation on conditional reasoning

    Oaksford, Michael (2002) Contrast classes and matching bias as explanations of the effects of negation on conditional reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 8 (2), pp. 135-151. ISSN 1354-6783.

    Full text not available from this repository.

    Abstract

    In this paper the arguments for optimal data selection and the contrast class account of negations in the selection task and the conditional inference task are summarised, and contrasted with the matching bias approach. It is argued that the probabilistic contrast class account provides a unified, rational explanation for effects across these tasks. Moreover, there are results that are only explained by the contrast class account that are also discussed. The only major anomaly is the explicit negations effect in the selection task (Evans, Clibbens, & Rood, 1996), which it is argued may not be the result of normal interpretative processes. It is concluded that the effects of negation on human reasoning provide good evidence for the view that human reasoning processes may be rational according to a probabilistic standard.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Article
    School: Birkbeck Schools and Departments > School of Science > Psychological Sciences
    Depositing User: Administrator
    Date Deposited: 19 Sep 2016 11:04
    Last Modified: 19 Sep 2016 11:04
    URI: http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/16095

    Statistics

    Downloads
    Activity Overview
    0Downloads
    90Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item