BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Is reliabilism a form of consequentialism?

    Ahlstrom-Vij, Kristoffer and Dunn, J. (2017) Is reliabilism a form of consequentialism? American Philosophical Quarterly 54 (2), pp. 183-194. ISSN 0003-0481.

    [img]
    Preview
    Text
    AhlstromVijDunn-Consequentialism.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript

    Download (199kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Reliabilism — the view that a belief is justified iff it is produced by a reliable process — is often characterized as a form of consequentialism. Recently, critics of reliabilism have suggested that, since a form of consequentialism, reliabilism condones a variety of problematic trade-offs, involving cases where someone forms an epistemically deficient belief now that will lead her to more epistemic value later. In the present paper, we argue that the relevant argument against reliabilism fails because it equivocates. While there is a sense in which reliabilism is a kind of consequentialism, it is not of a kind on which we should expect problematic trade-offs.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Article
    School: Birkbeck Schools and Departments > School of Social Sciences, History and Philosophy > Philosophy
    Depositing User: Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij
    Date Deposited: 19 Oct 2017 09:42
    Last Modified: 01 May 2018 00:10
    URI: http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/20123

    Statistics

    Downloads
    Activity Overview
    7Downloads
    48Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item