Cooper, Penelope and Dando, C.J. and Ormerod, T. and Mattison, M. and Marchant, R. and Milne, R. and Bull, R. (2018) One step forward and two steps back? The “20 Principles” for questioning vulnerable witnesses and the lack of an evidence-based approach. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof , ISSN 1365-7127.
![[img]](https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Authors' Final Cooper at al. (2018) One step forward, two steps back, 20 Principles, JEP.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript Restricted to Repository staff only Download (302kB) |
|
|
Text
23645a.pdf - Updated Version Download (279kB) | Preview |
Abstract
It is a widely held belief that questioning vulnerable witnesses is a specialist skill. In England and Wales vulnerable witness advocacy training built around ‘20 Principles’ has been developed and is being delivered. The 20 Principles do not cite a tested theoretical framework(s) or empirical evidence in support. This paper considers whether the 20 Principles are underpinned by research evidence. It is submitted that advocacy training and the approach to questioning witnesses in the courtroom should take into account the already available research evidence. The authors make recommendations for revision of the training and for a wider review of the approach taken to the handling of witness evidence.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Keyword(s) / Subject(s): | advocacy, questioning, training, vulnerable, witnesses |
| School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Social Sciences |
| Research Centres and Institutes: | Crime & Justice Policy Research, Institute for |
| Depositing User: | Penny Cooper |
| Date Deposited: | 21 Aug 2018 09:18 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 17:43 |
| URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/23645 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.
Archive Staff Only (login required)
