Rumfitt, I. (2010) Ricky Ponting and the judges. Analysis 70 (2), pp. 205-210. ISSN 0003-2638.Full text not available from this repository.
In the first innings of the final Ashes Test of 2009, Ricky Ponting faced a ball which was deflected, off something, into the wicket-keeper’s hands. The English XI appealed, and in the agonizingly long time that it took Asad Rauf to decide, Jonathan Agnew (commentating on Test Match Special) reasoned as follows: ‘Either the ball hit Ponting’s bat or it hit his pads. If it hit his bat, he is out caught behind. If it hit his pads, he is out lbw. So, either way, he is out’. Rauf, however, appeared to disagree with Agnew’s reasoning, and Ponting stayed at the wicket.
|School or Research Centre:||Birkbeck Schools and Research Centres > School of Social Sciences, History and Philosophy > Philosophy|
|Date Deposited:||24 Nov 2010 12:39|
|Last Modified:||17 Apr 2013 12:19|
Archive Staff Only (login required)