Tsetsos, K. and Usher, Marius and Chater, N. (2010) Preference reversal in multiattribute choice. Psychological Review 117 (4), pp. 1275-1293. ISSN 0033-295X.Full text not available from this repository.
A central puzzle for theories of choice is that people's preferences between options can be reversed by the presence of decoy options (that are not chosen) or by the presence of other irrelevant options added to the choice set. Three types of reversal effect reported in the decision-making literature, the attraction, compromise, and similarity effects, have been explained by a number of theoretical proposals. Yet a major theoretical challenge is capturing all 3 effects simultaneously. We review the range of mechanisms that have been proposed to account for decoy effects and analyze in detail 2 computational models. decision field theory (Roe, Busemeyer, & Townsend. 2001) and leaky competing accumulators (Usher & McClelland, 2004), that aim to combine several such mechanisms into an integrated account. By simulating the models, we examine differences in the ways the decoy effects are predicted. We argue that the LCA framework, which follows on Tversky's relational evaluation with loss aversion (Tversky & Kahneman, 1991), provides a more robust account, suggesting that common mechanisms are involved in both high-level decision making and perceptual choice, for which LCA was originally developed.
|Keyword(s) / Subject(s):||decision making, decoy effects, computational modes, dynamic models, loss aversion|
|School or Research Centre:||Birkbeck Schools and Research Centres > School of Science > Psychological Sciences|
|Date Deposited:||09 Jun 2011 14:46|
|Last Modified:||17 Apr 2013 12:20|
Archive Staff Only (login required)