Hough, Mike (2010) Gold standard or fool's gold: the pursuit of certainty in experimental criminology. Criminology & Criminal Justice 10 (1), pp. 11-22. ISSN 1748-8958.
|
Text
3815.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript Download (374kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article assesses some of the claims made for experimental research in the field of rehabilitation of offenders. It suggests that both policy officials and evaluators have tended to over-invest financially and intellectually in a technocratic model of reducing reoffending that emphasizes programmes for offenders, and to under-invest in models that see the process as a complex ‘people changing’ skill. It argues that the complexity of this process renders it hard to evaluate using experimental methods of evaluation such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RCTs provide strong internal validity, but in complex settings offer weak external validity, making it hard to generalize from the experimental setting to other settings. The article suggests that the proper role for evaluative research in this field should be seen as building and testing middle-level theories about how best to change offenders’ behaviour.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Keyword(s) / Subject(s): | evaluation, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), rehabilitation, work with offenders |
| School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Social Sciences |
| Research Centres and Institutes: | Crime & Justice Policy Research, Institute for |
| Depositing User: | Administrator |
| Date Deposited: | 19 Jul 2011 14:07 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 16:55 |
| URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/3815 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.
Archive Staff Only (login required)
