BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    The "is-ought fallacy" fallacy.

    Oaksford, Michael and Chater, N. (2011) The "is-ought fallacy" fallacy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5), pp. 262-263. ISSN 0140-525X.

    Full text not available from this repository.

    Abstract

    Mere facts about how the world is cannot determine how we ought to think or behave. Elqayam & Evans (E&E) argue that this “is-ought fallacy” undercuts the use of rational analysis in explaining how people reason, by ourselves and with others. But this presumed application of the “is-ought” fallacy is itself fallacious. Rational analysis seeks to explain how people do reason, for example in laboratory experiments, not how they ought to reason. Thus, no ought is derived from an is; and rational analysis is unchallenged by E&E's arguments.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Article
    School: Birkbeck Schools and Departments > School of Science > Psychological Sciences
    Depositing User: Administrator
    Date Deposited: 14 Nov 2011 12:43
    Last Modified: 17 May 2016 15:56
    URI: http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/4345

    Statistics

    Downloads
    Activity Overview
    0Downloads
    141Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item