Thomas, Michael S.C. (1998) Bilingualism and the single route/dual route debate. In: The 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1-4 Aug 1998, Madison, U.S..
Thomas4654.pdf - Published Version
Download (533kB) | Preview
The debate between single and dual route accounts of cognitive processes has been generated predominantly by the application of connectionist modeling techniques to two areas of psycholinguistics. This paper draws an analogy between this debate and bilingual language processing. A prominent question within bilingual word recognition is whether the bilingual has functionally separate lexicons for each language, or a single system able to recognize the words in both languages. Empirical evidence has been taken to support a model which includes two separate lexicons working in parallel (Smith, 1991; Gerard and Scarborough, 1989). However, a range of interference effects has been found between the bilingual’s two sets of lexical knowledge (Thomas, 1997a). Connectionist models have been put forward which suggest that a single representational resource may deal with these data, so long as words are coded according to language membership (Thomas, 1997a, 1997b, Dijkstra and van Heuven, 1998). This paper discusses the criteria which might be used to differentiate single route and dual route models. An empirical study is introduced to address one of these criteria, parallel access, with regard to bilingual word recognition. The study fails to find support for the dual route model.
|Item Type:||Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)|
|Additional Information:||Published in: Gernsbacher, M.A. and Derry, S.J., eds. 1998. The Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.|
|School or Research Centre:||Birkbeck Schools and Research Centres > School of Science > Psychological Sciences|
|Depositing User:||Sarah Hall|
|Date Deposited:||18 Apr 2012 13:45|
|Last Modified:||11 Oct 2016 12:01|
Archive Staff Only (login required)