BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

Inhibition and young children's performance on the Tower of London task

Baughman, Frank D. and Cooper, Richard P. (2007) Inhibition and young children's performance on the Tower of London task. Cognitive Systems Research 8 (3), pp. 216-226. ISSN 1389-0417.

[img]
Preview
Text
636.pdf

Download (643Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.004

Abstract

Young children, when performing problem solving tasks, show a tendency to break task rules and produce incomplete solutions. We propose that this tendency can be explained by understanding problem solving within the context of the development of “executive functions” – general cognitive control functions, which serve to regulate the operation of the cognitive system. This proposal is supported by the construction of two computational models that simulate separately the performance of 3–4 year old and 5–6 year old children on the Tower of London planning task. We seek in particular to capture the emerging role of inhibition in the older group. The basic framework within which the models are developed is derived from Fox and Das’ Domino model [Fox, J., & Das, S. (2000). Safe and sound: Artificial intelligence in hazardous applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press] and Norman and Shallice’s [Norman, D.A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. Davidson, G. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and Self Regulation (Vol. 4). New York: Plenum] theory of willed and automatic action. Two strategies and a simple perceptual bias are implemented within the models and comparisons between model and child performance reveal a good fit for the key dependent measures (number of rule breaks and percentage of incomplete solutions) of the two groups.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This is the author’s version of a work accepted for publication by Elsevier. Changes resulting from the publishing process, including peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting and other quality control mechanisms, may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version is available at Cognitive Systems Research 8 (3): http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.004
School or Research Centre: Birkbeck Schools and Research Centres > School of Science > Psychological Sciences
Depositing User: Sandra Plummer
Date Deposited: 08 Jan 2008 11:56
Last Modified: 17 Apr 2013 12:33
URI: http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/636

Archive Staff Only (login required)

Edit/View Item Edit/View Item