BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Sound 3-query PCPPs are long

    Ben-Sasson, E. and Harsha, P. and Lachish, Oded and Matsliah, A. (2009) Sound 3-query PCPPs are long. ACM Transactions on Computation Theory 1 (2), pp. 1-49. ISSN 1942-3454.

    Full text not available from this repository.

    Abstract

    We initiate the study of the trade-off between the length of a probabilistically checkable proof of proximity (PCPP) and the maximal soundness that can be guaranteed by a 3-query verifier with oracle access to the proof. Our main observation is that a verifier limited to querying a short proof cannot obtain the same soundness as that obtained by a verifier querying a long proof. Moreover, we quantify the soundness deficiency as a function of the proof-length and show that any verifier obtaining “best possible” soundness must query an exponentially long proof. In terms of techniques, we focus on the special class of inspective verifiers that read at most 2 proof-bits per invocation. For such verifiers, we prove exponential length-soundness trade-offs that are later on used to imply our main results for the case of general (i.e., not necessarily inspective) verifiers. To prove the exponential trade-off for inspective verifiers, we show a connection between PCPP proof length and property-testing query complexity that may be of independent interest. The connection is that any linear property that can be verified with proofs of length ℓ by linear inspective verifiers must be testable with query complexity ≈ logℓ.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Article
    School: Birkbeck Schools and Departments > School of Business, Economics & Informatics > Computer Science and Information Systems
    Depositing User: Sarah Hall
    Date Deposited: 30 May 2013 15:50
    Last Modified: 11 Oct 2016 12:01
    URI: http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/7135

    Statistics

    Downloads
    Activity Overview
    0Downloads
    87Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item