Touch and the limits of the rational museum, or can matter think?
Candlin, Fiona (2008) Touch and the limits of the rational museum, or can matter think? Senses and Society 3 (3), pp. 277-292. ISSN 1745-8927.
Like many other museums, the Enlightenment Gallery at The British Museum provides handling objects for visitors. As Enlightenment notions of science and rational thought have all been predicated upon a shift away multi-sensory experience towards objective vision, the introduction of these tactile objects could be read as a pre-modern anachronism. In contrast, this paper uses a close analysis of the Hans Sloane’s approach to collecting and John Locke’s empirical philosophy to ask whether it is possible to locate touch as part of the Enlightenment rational project. If so, then how do our conceptions of empiricism, museums and visitors change? I argue that for Sloane and Locke touch functions in rational terms, indeed it may be the basis of rational thought. At the same time, a careful reading of Locke and of Condillac’s work on Locke shows that touch simultaneously opens up other, imaginative, speculative and emotional ways of knowing material objects. Crucially, these forms of knowing are not in opposition to rationality but form part of the rational project. Thus, this analysis of touch disputes the accepted transition from multisensory, non-rational and pre-modern experience to visual, rational and modern knowledge, questions accepted characterisations of empiricism and also considers contemporary visitors’ complex understandings of museum objects.
|Keyword(s) / Subject(s):||touch, senses, empiricism, Enlightenment, British Museum, John Locke, Etienne Bonnot de Condillac, audience|
|School:||Birkbeck Schools and Departments > School of Arts > History of Art|
|Research Centre:||Birkbeck Knowledge Lab|
|Depositing User:||Fiona Candlin|
|Date Deposited:||08 Oct 2009 12:31|
|Last Modified:||02 Dec 2016 13:41|
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.