No evidence against Sketch Reinstatement of context, verbal labels or the use of registered intermediaries for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: response to Henry et al. (2017)

Dando, C.J. and Ormerod, T.C. and Cooper, Penelope and Marchant, M. and Mattison, M. and Milne, R. and Bull, R. (2018) No evidence against Sketch Reinstatement of context, verbal labels or the use of registered intermediaries for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: response to Henry et al. (2017). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 48 (7), pp. 2593-2596. ISSN 0162-3257.

Abstract

Recently, Henry et al. (2017) found no evidence for the use of Verbal labels, Sketch Reinstatement of Context and Registered Intermediaries by forensic practitioners when interviewing children with a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder. We consider their claims, noting the limited ecological validity of the experimental paradigm, the impacts of repeated interviewing where retrieval support is not provided at first retrieval, question the interviewer/intermediary training and their population relevant experience, and comment on the suppression of population variances. We submit that rejecting these techniques on the basis of this study is completely unwarranted and potentially damaging, particularly if used in legal proceedings to undermine the value of testimony from children with ASD, who continually struggle to gain access to justice.

Metadata

Statistics

DownloadsShow export options

Export as XMLJSONCSV

Activity Overview

6 month trend

252Downloads

6 month trend

180Hits

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

Archive Staff Only (login required)

Edit/View Item