‘The damned word’: culture and its (in)compatibility with law
Fitzpatrick, Peter (2005) ‘The damned word’: culture and its (in)compatibility with law. Law, Culture & the Humanities 1 (1), pp. 2-13. ISSN 1743-8721.
|
Text
494.pdf Download (177kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The compatibility and incompatibility between law and culture are identified through an analysis of relation. By way of exploring the elusiveness of conceptions of culture and of law, a commonality relating them is arrived at, one that indicates not only what they constituently share but also what distinguishes them from each other. So far an abstract abstract. The abstractness of the comment itself is relieved by references to a case study and by resorting to etymologies.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal Law, Culture & the Humanities 1 (1), 2005, © Association for the Study of Law, Culture, and the Humanities, 2005 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Law, Culture & the Humanities page: http://lch.sagepub.com on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/ Law, Culture & the Humanities is a publication of the Association for the Study of Law, Culture and the Humanities (The College of Liberal Arts, University of Texas at Austin). It is co-sponsored by the Socio-Legal Research Centre at Griffith University (Australia) and Amherst College (USA). |
| School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Business and Law > Birkbeck Law School |
| Depositing User: | Sandra Plummer |
| Date Deposited: | 15 May 2007 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 16:47 |
| URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/494 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.
Archive Staff Only (login required)
 |
Edit/View Item |