BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

How fundamental is the fundamental assumption?

Kurbis, Nils (2012) How fundamental is the fundamental assumption? Teorema 31 (2), pp. 5-19. ISSN 0210-1602.

[img]
Preview
Text
11046.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript

Download (241kB) | Preview

Abstract

The fundamental assumption of Dummett’s and Prawitz’ proof-theoretic justification of deduction is that ‘if we have a valid argument for a complex statement, we can construct a valid argument for it which finishes with an application of one of the introduction rules governing its principal operator’. I argue that the assumption is flawed in this general version, but should be restricted, not to apply to arguments in general, but only to proofs. I also argue that Dummett’s and Prawitz’ project of providing a logical basis for metaphysics only relies on the restricted assumption.

Metadata

Item Type: Article
Keyword(s) / Subject(s): proof-theoretic semantics, Michael Dummett, Dag Prawitz, verificationist theories of meaning, realism vs. anti-realism
School: Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Historical Studies
Depositing User: Sarah Hall
Date Deposited: 20 Nov 2014 11:57
Last Modified: 15 Jul 2025 12:36
URI: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/11046

Statistics

6 month trend
298Downloads
6 month trend
431Hits

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

Archive Staff Only (login required)

Edit/View Item
Edit/View Item