Open Peer Review and the Humanities: Questions, Practices, and Challenges

Brussels. 24th October 2016.

A book

Professor Martin Paul Eve, Birkbeck, University of London

Background

  • Professor of Literature, Technology & Publishing
  • Founder and CEO of the Open Library of Humanities
  • Author of Open Access and the Humanities (Cambridge UP)
  • Author of two open-access books (and two non-OA books)
  • BOAI working group & HEFCE OA Monographs
  • UK parliament evidence

Peer Review and the Humanities: Some questions

  • Same purpose as in natural sciences?
  • Urgency of work?
  • Abuses of power?
  • How good are we at gatekeeping?

Peer Review and the Humanities: Some practices

  • Often double-blind
  • Preprint culture developing far more slowly (if at all)
  • Conservative culture claims peer-review as gold standard
  • Books: proposals only? Full text?

Open Peer Review: Some challenges

  • Anonymity:
    • Double-blind: abusive language
    • Author known, reviewer unknown: abuse of power
    • Author unknown, reviewer known: abuse of power
    • Open: fear of criticism / fear of exposure
  • Participation
  • Time constraints

The End

Thank you!

Presentation licensed under a CC BY-SA 3.0 license. All institutional images excluded from CC license. Available to view online at http://meve.io/Brussels2016.