Open Peer Review and the Humanities: Questions, Practices, and Challenges
Brussels. 24th October 2016.
Professor Martin Paul Eve, Birkbeck, University of London
Background
- Professor of Literature, Technology & Publishing
- Founder and CEO of the Open Library of Humanities
- Author of Open Access and the Humanities (Cambridge UP)
- Author of two open-access books (and two non-OA books)
- BOAI working group & HEFCE OA Monographs
- UK parliament evidence
Peer Review and the Humanities: Some questions
- Same purpose as in natural sciences?
- Urgency of work?
- Abuses of power?
- How good are we at gatekeeping?
Peer Review and the Humanities: Some practices
- Often double-blind
- Preprint culture developing far more slowly (if at all)
- Conservative culture claims peer-review as gold standard
- Books: proposals only? Full text?
Open Peer Review: Some challenges
- Anonymity:
- Double-blind: abusive language
- Author known, reviewer unknown: abuse of power
- Author unknown, reviewer known: abuse of power
- Open: fear of criticism / fear of exposure
- Participation
- Time constraints
The End
Thank you!
Presentation licensed under a CC BY-SA 3.0 license. All institutional images excluded from CC license.
Available to view online at http://meve.io/Brussels2016.