BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Whistleblowing as a protracted process: a study of UK whistleblower journeys

    Vandekerckhove, W. and Phillips, Arron (2019) Whistleblowing as a protracted process: a study of UK whistleblower journeys. Journal of Business Ethics 159 , pp. 201-219. ISSN 0167-4544.

    [img]
    Preview
    Text
    17969 VANDEKERCKHOVE_Whistleblowing_as_a_Protracted_Process_2017.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript

    Download (385kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    This paper provides an exploration of whistleblowing as a protracted process, using secondary da-ta from 868 cases from a whistleblower advice line in the UK. Previous research on whistleblow-ing has mainly studied this phenomenon as a one-off decision by someone perceiving wrongdoing within an organisation to raise a concern or to remain silent. Earlier suggestions that whistleblowing is a process and that people find themselves inadvertently turned into whistleblowers by management responses, has not been followed up by a systematic study tracking the path of how a concern is repeatedly raised by whistleblowers. This paper provides a quantitative exploration of whistleblowing as a protracted process, rather than a one-off decision. Our research finds that the whistleblowing process generally entails two or even three internal at-tempts to raise a concern before an external attempt is made, if it is made at all. We also find that it is necessary to distinguish further between different internal (e.g. line manager, higher management, specialist channels) as well as external whistleblowing recipients (e.g. regulators, professional bodies, journalists). Our findings suggest that whistleblowing is a protracted process and that this process is internally more protracted than previously documented. The overall pattern is that whistleblowers tend to search for a more independent recipient at each successive attempt to raise their concern. Formal whistleblower power seems to determine which of the available recipients are perceived as viable, and also what the initial responses are in terms of retaliation and effectiveness.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: The final publication is available at Springer via the link above.
    School: Birkbeck Schools and Departments > School of Business, Economics & Informatics > Management
    Depositing User: Arron Phillips
    Date Deposited: 19 Feb 2019 12:39
    Last Modified: 12 Feb 2020 17:22
    URI: http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/26341

    Statistics

    Downloads
    Activity Overview
    129Downloads
    49Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item