Education vs screening: the use of capacity to consent tools in Psychiatric Genomics

Kong, Camillia and Efrem, M. and Campbell, M. (2019) Education vs screening: the use of capacity to consent tools in Psychiatric Genomics. Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (2), pp. 137-143. ISSN 0306-6800.

Abstract

Informed consent procedures for participation in psychiatric genomics research amongst individuals with mental disorder and intellectual disability can often be unclear, particularly because the underlying ethos guiding consent tools reflects a core ethical tension between safeguarding and inclusion. This tension reflects important debates around the function of consent tools, as well as the contested legitimacy of decision-making capacity thresholds to screen potentially vulnerable participants. Drawing on human rights, person-centred psychiatry, and supported decision-making, this paper problematises the use of consent procedures as screening tools in psychiatric genomics studies, particularly as increasing normative emphasis has shifted towards empowerment and participation of those with mental disorder and intellectual disabilities. We expound on core aspects of supported decision-making, such as relational autonomy and hermeneutic competence, to orient consent procedures towards a more educative, participatory framework that is better aligned with developments in disability studies. The paper concludes with an acknowledgement of the pragmatic and substantive challenges in adopting this framework in psychiatric genomics studies if this participatory ethos towards persons with mental disorder and intellectual disability is to be fully realised.

Metadata

Statistics

DownloadsShow export options

Export as XMLJSONCSV

Activity Overview

6 month trend

238Downloads

6 month trend

141Hits

Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

Archive Staff Only (login required)

Edit/View Item