BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Estranged relations: coercion and care in narratives of supported decision-making in mental healthcare

    Stone, M. and Kokanovic, R. and Callard, Felicity and Broom, A.F. (2019) Estranged relations: coercion and care in narratives of supported decision-making in mental healthcare. Medical Humanities , medhum-2018. ISSN 1473-4265.

    [img]
    Preview
    Text
    28450.pdf - Published Version of Record
    Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

    Download (352kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Supported decision-making has become popular among policymakers and mental health advocates as a means of reducing coercion in mental healthcare. Nevertheless, users of psychiatric services often seem equivocal about the value of supported decision-making initiatives. In this paper we explore why such initiatives might be rejected or ignored by the would-be beneficiaries, and we reflect on broader implications for care and coercion. We take a critical medical humanities approach, particularly through the lens of entanglement. We analyse the narratives of 29 people diagnosed with mental illness, and 29 self-identified carers speaking of their experiences of an Australian mental healthcare system and of their views of supported decision-making. As a scaffolding for our critique we consider two supported decision-making instruments in the 2014 Victorian Mental Health Act: the advance statement and the nominated person. These instruments presuppose that patients and carers endorse a particular set of relationships between the agentic self and illness, as well as between patient, carer and the healthcare system. Our participant narratives instead conveyed ‘entangled’ relations, which we explore in three sections. In the first we show how ideas about fault and illness often coexisted, which corresponded with shifting views on the need for more versus less agency for patients. In the second section, we illustrate how family carers struggled to embody the supported decision-making ideal of the independent yet altruistic nominated person, and in the final section we suggest that both care and coercion were narrated as existing across informal/formal care divisions. We conclude by reflecting on how these dynamic relations complicate supported decision-making projects, and prompt a rethink of how care and coercion unfold in contemporary mental healthcare.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Article
    Keyword(s) / Subject(s): Original research, 1506, psychiatry, sociology, medical anthropology, medical humanities, patient narratives
    School: Birkbeck Schools and Departments > School of Social Sciences, History and Philosophy > Psychosocial Studies
    SWORD Depositor: Mr Joe Tenant
    Depositing User: Mr Joe Tenant
    Date Deposited: 06 Aug 2019 11:09
    Last Modified: 08 Aug 2019 04:28
    URI: http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/28450

    Statistics

    Downloads
    Activity Overview
    99Downloads
    41Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item