Dissemination vs. Assessment
University of Sussex. 11th November 2015.
Dr. Martin Paul Eve, Birkbeck, University of London
Why do we publish?
To be read. To be assessed.
Dissemination: Quality Control, Validation and Space-Time Compression
- Dissemination of work
- Preservation of record
- Footnotes and scholarly genealogy (vs. science?)
- Labour of reading: reading-avoidance techniques
- Dissemination at a distance
- Difference to conferences?
Assessment
The Symbolic Economy Maps onto the Real Economy
Reading and assessment are in conflict
- Drive to produce ever more work
- Hyper-inflationary price increases
- Libraries cannot afford to purchase
- Micro-monopolies
Dual crises of supply and demand
For assessment to work, we must restrict publication volume to size of academic job market: predicated on teaching
Open Access (OA)
- Peer-reviewed research
- Free to read online
- Permission to re-use
- Gold: at publisher/source
- Green: institutional/subject repository
- Gratis: free to read
- Libre: free to re-use
Background image © PLOS. Used under a CC BY-SA 3.0 license.
Monographs and OA: harder
- Monographs acknowledged as different
- Higher barriers to entry for new publishers
- Open source platform development in infancy
- Different discoverability and value-conferral sites
- Different selection process and sites of risk
Monographs and OA: some solutions
- Knowledge Unlatched / OLH consortia
- Book Processing Charges (won't scale)
- Green OA for books
- Freemium
- Multi-stage OA
The End
Thank you!
Presentation licensed under a CC BY-SA 3.0 license. All institutional images excluded from CC license.
Available to view online at http://meve.io/Sussex2015.