Putting reasoning and judgement in their proper argumentative place

Oaksford, Mike (2011) Putting reasoning and judgement in their proper argumentative place. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (04), pp. 84-85. ISSN 0140-525X.

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000239

Abstract

If Bayesian Fundamentalism existed, Jones & Love's (J&L's) arguments would provide a necessary corrective. But it does not. Bayesian cognitive science is deeply concerned with characterizing algorithms and representations, and, ultimately, implementations in neural circuits; it pays close attention to environmental structure and the constraints of behavioral data, when available; and it rigorously compares multiple models, both within and across papers. J&L's recommendation of Bayesian Enlightenment corresponds to past, present, and, we hope, future practice in Bayesian cognitive science.

Metadata

Item Type:	Article
School:	School of Science > Psychological Sciences
Depositing User:	Sarah Hall
Date Deposited:	26 Nov 2015 16:04
Last Modified:	06 Oct 2020 06:25
URI:	https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/13612

Statistics

Archive Staff Only (login required)

Edit/View Item