BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Deontic reasoning, modules and innateness: a second look

    Chater, N. and Oaksford, Mike (1996) Deontic reasoning, modules and innateness: a second look. Mind & Language 11 (2), pp. 191-202. ISSN 0268-1064.

    Full text not available from this repository.

    Abstract

    Cummins (this issue) puts the case for an innate module for deontic reasoning. We argue that this case is not persuasive. First, we claim that Cummins’evolutionary arguments are neutral regarding whether deontic reasoning is learned or innate. Second, we argue that task differences between deontic and indicative reasoning explain many of the phenomena that Cummins takes as evidence for a deontic module. Third, we argue against the suggestion that deontic reasoning is superior to indicative reasoning, either in adults or children. Finally, we re-evaluate Cummins’interpretation of differences in children's performance on deontic and indicative versions of Wason's selection task.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Article
    School: School of Science > Psychological Sciences
    Depositing User: Administrator
    Date Deposited: 15 Sep 2016 16:42
    Last Modified: 06 Oct 2020 07:32
    URI: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/16065

    Statistics

    Downloads
    Activity Overview
    0Downloads
    107Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item