--- layout: post status: publish published: true title: My day as a Higher Ed researcher wordpress_id: 2003 wordpress_url: https://www.martineve.com/?p=2003 date: !binary |- MjAxMi0wNC0wMiAxODo0Mzo1MSArMDIwMA== date_gmt: !binary |- MjAxMi0wNC0wMiAxODo0Mzo1MSArMDIwMA== categories: - Academia tags: - dayofhighered comments: - id: 6669 author: David Hull author_email: davhull@gmail.com author_url: http://fffish.wordpress.org date: !binary |- MjAxMi0wNC0wMyAxMDowMzoyOCArMDIwMA== date_gmt: !binary |- MjAxMi0wNC0wMyAxMDowMzoyOCArMDIwMA== content: ! "Martin, this post only confirms what I've long suspected: that you are in fact a research cyborg sent from the future to put other PhD students to shame! This would also explain how you were able to finish Fearless Speech seven minutes before starting it! :P\r\n\r\nJokes aside, thanks for this post, and your previous one. They really are quite helpful in assessing one's work patterns. I particularly appreciated your advice about 'functional' reading. I suddenly realised how precious I get about everything I read. Time to be a bit more ruthless!" - id: 6671 author: Martin Paul Eve author_email: martin@martineve.com author_url: '' date: !binary |- MjAxMi0wNC0wMyAxMDoyNTo1NCArMDIwMA== date_gmt: !binary |- MjAxMi0wNC0wMyAxMDoyNTo1NCArMDIwMA== content: ! 'Ha, David: you are a cheeky so-and-so! That said, thanks for pointing out the typo; John Connor is safe this time, now I''ve fixed the typo! I''ll also point out that Fearless Speech is a tiny book (pocket-sized) with big type! M' ---
A growing criticism mounted by students/parents of students is the trite argument that there are too few contact hours. Anybody who works as a researcher/lecturer/tutor can demolish this argument in two seconds flat, but the problem now seems to be extending to HR managers, who apparently think that their staff only work about 1/2 the year (ie. when students are around). Let me point something out. One of the reasons that people teach in HE is because they know stuff. They know a lot of stuff. It may surprise you to know, though, that they weren't born knowing stuff; they had to invest quite a significant amount of time learning, as the Twitter hashtag that people are using today "#dayofhighered" shows. Today was one of my research days. Here's what I did. I'm also going to include Sunday (I worked Saturday too) as it was spillover from Monday's work:
Sunday:
Time | Activity |
---|---|
9.00 | Began typesetting articles for new scholarly journal |
13.00 | Break for lunch |
14.00 | Continue typesetting |
16.00 | Finish typesetting |
Monday:
Time | Activity |
---|---|
06.30 | Get up |
08.45 | Leave for British Library. En route, read and annotate 15 pages of primary material for current research topic |
09.30 | Write preface for launch issue of new scholarly journal with which I am involved |
10.09 | Email preface to co-editors for comment |
10.11 | Begin reading, annotating and integrating Mattessich, Stefan. Lines of Flight: Discursive Time and Countercultural Desire in the Work of Thomas Pynchon. Durham: Duke University Press, 2002 into thesis and monograph work |
11.57 | Receive email of transcript from presentation and request to convert to article for journal publication by 1st of May. Respond to email accepting with an additional query |
10.58 | Resume reading |
12.38 | Break for lunch |
13.03 | Resume reading |
14.26 | Finish reading book #1 (290 pages) |
14.27 | Email colleague regarding joint proposal for conference paper on an in-progress Digital Humanities project |
14.35 | Begin reading, annotating and integrating Foucault, Michel. Fearless Speech. Ed. Joseph Pearson. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 2001 into thesis and monograph work |
15.28 | Finish reading book #2 (183 pages). Break for tea |
15.50 | Begin (re-)reading, annotating and integrating chapter 1 of Hite, Molly. Ideas of Order in the Novels of Thomas Pynchon. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1983 into thesis and monograph work |
16.03 | Finish reading book chapter (30 pages) |
16.04 | Begin reading Elliott, Jane, and Derek Attridge. “Theory’s Nine Lives.” In Theory After “Theory,” edited by Jane Elliott and Derek Attridge, 1–15. New York: Routledge, 2011 |
16.20 | Finish previous reading. Begin Osborne, Peter. “Philosophy After Theory: Transdisciplinarity and the New.” In Theory After “Theory,” edited by Jane Elliott and Derek Attridge, 19–34. New York: Routledge, 2011 |
16.53 | Finish reading |
16.54 | Re-write paragraph of thesis/monograph on history of Theory/theory/philosophy as terms with detailed political histories |
16.57 | Respond to communication regarding archival procedures/digital preservation for Open Access journals |
17.05 | Begin re-writing transcription as journal article |
18.05 | Leave British Library and read a further 20 pages of primary material on train home |
18.56 | Arrive home, respond to further emails and admin |
19.30 | Write this post |
19.39 | Dinner at last (well, can start cooking it) |
That's what a day looks like as a researcher. I like what I do and feel privileged to do it, but it's long hours and is paid on an AHRC grant of £12,000 per year, so please don't say that we don't work hard.
Featured image by Ellen Forsyth under a CC-BY-NC-SA license.