BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Psychiatric diagnosis: the indispensability of ambivalence

    Callard, Felicity (2014) Psychiatric diagnosis: the indispensability of ambivalence. Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (8), pp. 526-530. ISSN 0306-6800.

    [img]
    Preview
    Text
    20406.pdf - Published Version of Record
    Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

    Download (325kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    The author analyses how debate over the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has tended to privilege certain conceptions of psychiatric diagnosis over others, as well as to polarise positions regarding psychiatric diagnosis. The article aims to muddy the black and white tenor of many discussions regarding psychiatric diagnosis by moving away from the preoccupation with diagnosis as classification and refocusing attention on diagnosis as a temporally and spatially complex, as well as highly mediated process. The article draws on historical, sociological and first-person perspectives regarding psychiatric diagnosis in order to emphasise the conceptual—and potentially ethical—benefits of ambivalence vis-à-vis the achievements and problems of psychiatric diagnosis.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Article
    School: School of Social Sciences, History and Philosophy > Psychosocial Studies
    Research Centres and Institutes: Social Research, Birkbeck Institute for (BISR)
    Depositing User: Administrator
    Date Deposited: 28 Jul 2015 12:05
    Last Modified: 14 Jun 2021 18:06
    URI: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/20406

    Statistics

    Activity Overview
    6 month trend
    259Downloads
    6 month trend
    64Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item