BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Paradigms, possibilities and probabilities: Comment on Hinterecker et al. (2016)

    Oaksford, Mike and Over, D. and Cruz de echeverria loebell, Nicole (2019) Paradigms, possibilities and probabilities: Comment on Hinterecker et al. (2016). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 45 (2), pp. 288-297. ISSN 0278-7393.

    [img]
    Preview
    Text
    21183.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript

    Download (595kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Hinterecker et al. (2016) compared the adequacy of the probabilistic new paradigm in reasoning with the recent revision of mental models theory (MMT) for explaining a novel class of inferences containing the modal term “possibly”. For example, the door is closed or the window is open or both, therefore, possibly the door is closed and the window is open (A or B or both, therefore, possibly(A & B)). They concluded that their results support MMT. In this comment, it is argued that Hinterecker et al. (2016) have not adequately characterised the theory of probabilistic validity (p-validity) on which the new paradigm depends. It is unclear how p-validity can be applied to these inferences, which are anyway peripheral to the theory. It is also argued that the revision of MMT is not well motivated and its adoption leads to many logical absurdities. Moreover, the comparison is not appropriate because these theories are defined at different levels of computational explanation. In particular, revised MMT lacks a provably consistent computational level theory that could justify treating these inferences as valid. It is further argued that the data could result from the non-colloquial locutions used to express the premises. Finally, an alternative pragmatic account is proposed based on the idea that a conclusion is possible if what someone knows cannot rule it out. This account could be applied to the unrevised mental model theory rendering the revision redundant.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: ©American Psychological Association 2018. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at the DOI cited above.
    Keyword(s) / Subject(s): New paradigm, mental models, modal inference, probability logic, epistemic modals
    School: School of Science > Psychological Sciences
    Depositing User: Administrator
    Date Deposited: 12 Feb 2018 08:37
    Last Modified: 30 Sep 2021 10:58
    URI: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/21183

    Statistics

    Downloads
    Activity Overview
    0Downloads
    0Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item