BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Is the norm on belief evaluative? A response to McHugh

    Greenberg, Alexander and Cowie, Christopher (2017) Is the norm on belief evaluative? A response to McHugh. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1), pp. 128-145. ISSN 0279-0750.

    This is the latest version of this item.

    [img] Text
    is-the-norm-on-belief-evaluative.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript

    Download (470kB)


    We respond to Conor McHugh’s claim that an evaluative account of the normative relation between belief and truth is preferable to a prescriptive account. We claim that his arguments fail to establish this. We then draw a more general sceptical conclusion: we take our arguments to put pressure on any attempt to show that an evaluative account will fare better than a prescriptive account. We briefly express scepticism about whether McHugh’s more recent ‘fitting attitude’ account fares better.


    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: This is the peer reviewed version of the article, which has been published in final form at the link above. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
    School: School of Social Sciences, History and Philosophy > Philosophy
    Depositing User: Alexander Greenberg
    Date Deposited: 19 Apr 2018 07:55
    Last Modified: 04 Jul 2022 12:28

    Available Versions of this Item

    • Is the norm on belief evaluative? A response to McHugh. (deposited 19 Apr 2018 07:55) [Currently Displayed]


    Activity Overview
    6 month trend
    6 month trend

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item