BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    The psychic life of fragments: splitting from Ferenczi to Klein

    Soreanu, Raluca (2018) The psychic life of fragments: splitting from Ferenczi to Klein. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis 78 (4), pp. 421-444. ISSN 0002-9548.

    [img]
    Preview
    Text
    Soreanu_The Psychic Life of Fragments [last version] AJP.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript

    Download (271kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    The present paper starts from the reflection that there is a curious “phenomenological gap” in psychoanalysis when it comes to processes of splitting and to describing the “life” of psychic fragments resulting from processes of splitting. In simpler terms, we are often in a position to lack a precise understanding of what is being split and how the splitting occurs. I argue that although Melanie Klein’s work is often engaged when talking of splitting (particularly through discussions on identification, projection and projective identification), there are some important phenomenological opacities in her construction. I show that by orchestrating a dialogue between Melanie Klein and Sándor Ferenczi, we arrive at a fuller and more substantive conception of psychic splitting and of the psychic life of fragments which are the result of splitting. This is even more meaningful because there are some unacknowledged genealogical connections between Ferenczian concepts and Kleinian concepts, which I here explore. While with Klein we remain in the domain of “good” and “bad” objects—polarised objects which are constantly split and projected—with Ferenczi we are able to also give an account of complicated forms of imitation producing psychic fragments and with a “dark” side of identification, which he calls “identification with the aggressor”. While attempting to take steps toward imagining a dialogue between Klein and Ferenczi, I note a certain silent “Ferenczian turn” in a late text by Melanie Klein, “On the Development of Mental Functioning”, written in 1958. In particular, I reflect on her reference to some “terrifying figures” of the psyche, which cannot be accounted for simply as the persecutory parts of the super-ego but are instead more adequately read as more enigmatic and more primitive psychic fragments, resulting from processes of splitting.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Article
    Keyword(s) / Subject(s): Sándor Ferenczi, Melanie Klein, splitting, identification with the aggressor, Orpha, teratoma, terrifying figures
    School: School of Social Sciences, History and Philosophy > Psychosocial Studies
    Depositing User: Raluca Soreanu
    Date Deposited: 16 Jan 2019 14:10
    Last Modified: 12 Feb 2021 18:16
    URI: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/25850

    Statistics

    Downloads
    Activity Overview
    289Downloads
    108Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item