BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Unchecked and unbalanced? The politics and policy of US nuclear launch authority

    Singh, Robert (2018) Unchecked and unbalanced? The politics and policy of US nuclear launch authority. Orbis 63 (1), pp. 116-131. ISSN 0030-4387.

    [img]
    Preview
    Text
    Orbis.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript
    Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

    Download (212kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Presidential control of U.S. nuclear launch authority lacks robust checks and balances. Recent congressional attempts to restrict sole presidential control over first use of nuclear weapons are the latest expression of periodic concern over this exception to the constitutional system of fragmented authority and mutual veto powers. Such attempts to limit the Commander-in-Chief's discretion nonetheless raise serious constitutional and strategic issues that, on balance, argue against a stronger congressional role. A better option that applies the constitutional spirit of checks and balances while preserving necessary strategic flexibility is executive concurrence. Requiring the President to obtain concurrent authorization from the Secretary of Defense and Attorney General for nuclear first use would offer a double security in offering political and legal cover to Presidents for their decision while protecting the uniformed military from having to make independent assessments of the legality of a presidential launch order.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Article
    School: School of Social Sciences, History and Philosophy > Politics
    Depositing User: Rob Singh
    Date Deposited: 21 Jan 2019 10:55
    Last Modified: 11 Feb 2021 21:07
    URI: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/25889

    Statistics

    Downloads
    Activity Overview
    91Downloads
    89Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item