The Future of Open Research and its Impact on Humanities and Social Science
Queen's University, Belfast. 5th December 2019.
Professor Martin Paul Eve, Birkbeck, University of London
Open Access (OA)
- Peer-reviewed research
- Free to read online
- Permission to re-use
- Gold: at publisher/source
- Green: institutional/subject repository
- Gratis: free to read
- Libre: free to re-use
Background image © PLOS. Used under a CC BY-SA 3.0 license.
Humanities Outputs
- Books
- Journals
- Data/Software/Other(!)
Why do we make these types of object? Are they still the best?
Books. Let's Start with a Problem
- Mellon Ithaka study (2016): $15,140 - $129,909 [cost]
- Palgrave: $95 x 200 copies = $19,000 [price]
- Open Book Publishers: ~£6,000 (2015) [cost]
- UCL Press: ~£14,000 [£400k/25 books/6 journals] [cost]
- CUP: Variable Book Processing Charge: $10,000 [price]
- Ubiquity Press: Book Processing Charge: £6,890 [price]
Pinter, Frances. “Why Book Processing Charges (BPCs) Vary So Much.” Journal of Electronic Publishing, vol. 21, no. 1, 2018. doi:10.3998/3336451.0021.101.
Where do these costs go?
Assume fixed costs:
- 3x staff + on and estates costs
- Travel and subsitence
- CLOCKSS, Crossref, COPE, COUNTER memberships
- Around £190k per year
Assume production costs:
- Typesetting: £500
- Copyediting: £500
How many books with 3x staff?
My University's English Department's Entire Book Budget
£7900
Less next year
A matter of distribution: there are 100 people in a room for a talk
- They have $10 each
- The speaker speaks for free
- The venue needs $50 to cover its staff costs
- There are 40 talks per year
Subscription logic
- Each person pays $0.50 and hears the talk
- No payment, no entry
- Each person can only afford half of the talks
- The general public cannot attend
OA with a Book Processing Charge
- The speaker pays the full fee ($50)
- The problem is that the speaker only has $10
- The general public and all others can attend
OA with consortial logic
- 5 people attend each talk and pay $10 each
- They let anyone else attend for free
- Everyone can hear 50% of the talks, including the public
This is how OA looks in a dry funding climate
- Is the "venue" overcharging?
- The distribution of the economics is the most important thing
- BPCs do not work well in the humanities
- BPCs concentrate costs
BPCs for monographs scale badly + concentrate costs
- 5,023 monographs in UK in 2013 by largest 4 publishers (source: Crossick)
- At a £5,050 BPC (UP price): £25,366,150
- At a £6,500 BPC (CUP price): £32,649,500
- At an £11,000 BPC (Palgrave price): £55,253,000
- UK spend on all books 2010/2011: ~£60,000,000 [~£12m on res monographs] (source: SCONUL)
BPCs for monographs scale badly
UK REF costs for monographs
"to publish 75% of anticipated monographic submission output for the next REF would require approximately £96m investment over the census period. This is equivalent to £19.2m per year. Academic library budgets as they are currently apportioned would not support this cost."
Eve, M.P. et al., (2017). Cost estimates of an open access mandate for monographs in the UK’s third Research Excellence Framework. Insights. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.392
Why We Must Solve These Economic Problems
Problem 1: Researcher access
See above: our book budget
Problem 2: Public access
- Increasingly educated populace
- Institutional missions to benefit society
- The academy becomes irrelevant
- Especially the humanities
- Imagine a world of OA sciences and toll-access humanities
Problem 3: Restrictive Re-Use Rights
- Photocopying licenses
- Text mining/derivatives prohibited
- Inclusion in Wikipedia and other resources
- Community translation
COPIM (Community-led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs)
- £2.2m funded project from Research England
- Infrastructure work
- Business model work
- Converting university presses to OA
Other Models are Available
Let's Talk About Journals
Megajournal / Multijournal / Not-for-profit / Collectively Funded
Support from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
- $90,000 planning grant
- University of Lincoln, UK, 2014-2015
- $741,000 sustainability grant
- Birkbeck, University of London, UK, 2015-2018
The Subscription Model as it Exists
The OLH Library Partnership Subsidy Model
>240 Libraries Financially Supporting the OLH in First Two Years
23 Journals on or Supported by the Platform (909 articles in first year)
Cost per institution per article: around $1.10 per institution per article. Target of 300+ libraries by end of year three.
118,686 unique readers. Average of 131 readers per article. $0.008 per institution per reader.
Ongoing Project to "Flip" Subscription Journals

Six additional journals joined in January 2017
Spreading The Model

Radical Research Forms
- Data are "stuff"
- Software is mega-hard to preserve
- Balance between individuation, resourcing, and preservation
Plan S
Pan-European (and possibly broader) initiative for OA by 2020. Includes monographs with time delay.
What we don't know... #1
- Hybrid: disallowed, or just unfunded?
- How to handle third-party material (encapsulation, Article 13)
- Legal status of transparency of costs
What we don't know... #2
- XML/JATS deposit in green route: hard work
- Support for alternative business models: how will this be provided?
- When will this apply to books? What are publishers doing to prepare?
- REF: in or out?
The End
Presentation licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license. All institutional images excluded from CC license.
Available to view online at https://pres.eve.gd/QUB2019.