1. Baron-Cohen S. Mindblindness: an essay on autism and theory of mind. Boston: MIT Press/Bradford Books; 1995. Asperger syndrome. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied 8. Heider H, Simmel M. An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am J 33. Organization WH. The ICD-10 Classification of mental and behavioural Psychol. 1944;57(2):243-59. 9. Mar RA, Macrae CN. Triggering the intentional stance. Novartis Foundation 34. Charman T, Gotham K. Measurement issues: screening and diagnostic Symp. 2007;278:111-20 discussion 20-33, 216-21. 10. Schurz M, Radua J, Aichhorn M, Richlan F, Perner J. Fractionating theory of practice. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2013;18(1):52-63. mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neurosci 35. Lord C, Risi S, Lambrecht L, Cook EH Jr, Leventhal BL, DiLavore PC, et al. The Biobehav Rev. 2014;42:9-34. 11. Loth E, Spooren W, Ham LM, Isaac MB, Auriche-Benichou C, Banaschewski T, social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. et al. Identification and validation of biomarkers for autism spectrum J Autism Dev Disord. 2000;30(3):205-23. disorders. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;15(1):70-3. 12. Kana RK, Keller TA, Cherkassky VL, Minshew NJ, Just MA. Atypical frontalAngeles: Western Psychological Services; 2003. posterior synchronization of Theory of Mind regions in autism during 37. Charman T, Loth E, Tillmann J, Crawley D, Wooldridge C, Goyard D, et al. mental state attribution. Social neuroscience. 2009;4(2):135-52. The EU-AIMS Longitudinal European Autism Project (LEAP): clinical 13. Kana RK, Maximo JO, Williams DL, Keller TA, Schipul SE, Cherkassky VL, et al. characterisation. Mol Autism. 2017;8:27. Aberrant functioning of the theory-of-mind network in children and 38. Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S. Improved optimization for the adolescents with autism. Mol Autism. 2015;6:59. 14. Weisberg J, Milleville SC, Kenworthy L, Wallace GL, Gotts SJ, Beauchamp MS, images. Neuroimage. 2002;17(2):825-41. et al. Social perception in autism spectrum disorders: impaired category 39. Hus V, Gotham K, Lord C. Standardizing ADOS domain scores: separating selectivity for dynamic but not static images in ventral temporal cortex. severity of social affect and restricted and repetitive behaviors. J Autism Dev Cerebral Cortex. 2014;24(1):37-48. 15. Patriquin MA, DeRamus T, Libero LE, Laird A, Kana RK. Neuroanatomical and 40. Constantino J, Gruber C. Social responsiveness scale. In: Volkmar FR, editor. neurofunctional markers of social cognition in autism spectrum disorder. Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders. New York: Springer; 2013. Hum Brain Mapping. 2016;37(11):3957-78. 16. Philip RC, Dauvermann MR, Whalley HC, Baynham K, Lawrie SM, Stanfield an ordered-categorical measure of child mental health: description and AC. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the fMRI investigation of validation in British and Norwegian samples. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr autism spectrum disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(2):901-42. Epidemiol. 2011;46(6):521-32. 17. Dickstein DP, Pescosolido MF, Reidy BL, Galvan T, Kim KL, Seymour KE, et al. 42. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical Developmental meta-analysis of the functional neural correlates of autism power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. spectrum disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013;52(3):279-89 e16. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175-91. 18. Sugranyes G, Kyriakopoulos M, Corrigall R, Taylor E, Frangou S. Autism 43. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Revised spectrum disorders and schizophrenia: meta-analysis of the neural correlates Edition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988. of social cognition. PloS One. 2011;6(10):e25322. 19. Di Martino A, Ross K, Uddin LQ, Sklar AB, Castellanos FX, Milham MP. and inference in fMRI. PloS One. 2017;12(11):e0184923. Functional brain correlates of social and nonsocial processes in autism 45. Castelli F, Happe F, Frith U, Frith C. Movement and mind: a functional spectrum disorders: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Biol imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional Psychiatry. 2009;65(1):63-74. 20. Blakemore SJ. The social brain in adolescence. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(4):267-77. 46. Moriguchi Y, Ohnishi T, Mori T, Matsuda H, Komaki G. Changes of brain 21. Kilford EJ, Garrett E, Blakemore SJ. The development of social cognition in activity in the neural substrates for theory of mind during childhood and adolescence: an integrated perspective. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;70:106-20. adolescence. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007;61(4):355-63. 22. Di Martino A, Yan CG, Li Q, Denio E, Castellanos FX, Alaerts K, et al. The 47. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, autism brain imaging data exchange: towards a large-scale evaluation of Delcroix N, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using the intrinsic brain architecture in autism. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19(6):659-67. a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. 23. Di Martino A, O'Connor D, Chen B, Alaerts K, Anderson JS, Assaf M, et al. Neuroimage. 2002;15(1):273-89. Enhancing studies of the connectome in autism using the autism brain 48. Eickhoff SB, Heim S, Zilles K, Amunts K. Testing anatomically specified imaging data exchange II. Sci Data. 2017;4:170010. 24. Loth E, Charman T, Mason L, Tillmann J, Jones EJH, Wooldridge C, et al. The Neuroimage. 2006;32(2):570-82. EU-AIMS Longitudinal European Autism Project (LEAP): design and 49. Wang AT, Lee SS, Sigman M, Dapretto M. Neural basis of irony methodologies to identify and validate stratification biomarkers for autism comprehension in children with autism: the role of prosody and context. spectrum disorders. Mol Autism. 2017;8:24. 25. Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ES, et al. 50. Sebastian CL, Fontaine NM, Bird G, Blakemore SJ, Brito SA, McCrory EJ, et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of Neural processing associated with cognitive and affective Theory of Mind in neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(5):365-76. 26. Abell F, Happé F, Frith U. Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental 51. Moor BG, Macks ZA, Guroglu B, Rombouts SA, Molen MW, Crone EA. states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. Cognitive Neurodevelopmental changes of reading the mind in the eyes. Soc Cogn Development. 2000;15:1-16. 27. White SJ, Coniston D, Rogers R, Frith U. Developing the Frith-Happe 52. Poldrack RA. Interpreting developmental changes in neuroimaging signals. animations: a quick and objective test of Theory of Mind for adults with Hum Brain Mapp. 2010;31(6):872-8. autism. Autism Res. 2011;4(2):149-54. 28. Moessnang C, Otto K, Bilek E, Schafer A, Baumeister S, Hohmann S, et al. changes in the structure of the social brain in late childhood and Differential responses of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and right adolescence. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014;9(1):123-31. posterior superior temporal sulcus to spontaneous mentalizing. Hum Brain 54. Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. Mapp. 2017;38(8):3791-803. 29. Moessnang C, Schafer A, Bilek E, Roux P, Otto K, Baumeister S, et al. 55. Ioannidis JP. Excess significance bias in the literature on brain volume Specificity, reliability and sensitivity of social brain responses during abnormalities. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(8):773-80. spontaneous mentalizing. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016. 30. Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. In: generates irreproducible results. Nat Methods. 2015;12(3):179-85. Association AP, editor. 4 ed. Washington, DC 1994. 31. Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. In: et al. Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible Association AP, editor. 4 ed. Washington, DC. 2000. 32. Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th 58. Apperly IA, Butterfill SA. Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and ed. Arlington: Author; 2013. disorders: diagnostic criteria for research. In: WHO, editor. Geneva. 1993. instruments for autism spectrum disorders - lessons from research and autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of 36. Rutter M, Le Couteur A, Lord C. Autism diagnostic interview-revised. Los robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain Disord. 2014;44(10):2400-12. 41. Goodman A, Heiervang E, Collishaw S, Goodman R. The ‘DAWBA bandsás 44. Cremers HR, Wager TD, Yarkoni T. The relation between statistical power movement patterns. Neuroimage. 2000;12(3):314-25. hypotheses in functional imaging using cytoarchitectonic maps. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 4):932-43. adolescents and adults. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012;7(1):53-63. Affect Neurosci. 2012;7(1):44-52. 53. Mills KL, Lalonde F, Clasen LS, Giedd JN, Blakemore SJ. Developmental 2005;2(8):e124. 56. Halsey LG, Curran-Everett D, Vowler SL, Drummond GB. The fickle P value 57. Poldrack RA, Baker CI, Durnez J, Gorgolewski KJ, Matthews PM, Munafo MR, neuroimaging research. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(2):115-26. belief-like states? Psychol Rev. 2009;116(4):953-70. 59. Grossmann T. The development of social brain functions in infancy. Psychol Bull. 2015;141(6):1266-87. 60. Kulke L, von Duhn B, Schneider D, Rakoczy H. Is implicit theory of mind a real and robust phenomenon? Results from a systematic replication study. Psychol Sci. 2018;29(6):888-900. 61. Richardson H, Lisandrelli G, Riobueno-Naylor A, Saxe R. Development of the social brain from age three to twelve years. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1027. 62. McCormick EM, van Hoorn J, Cohen JR, Telzer EH. Functional connectivity in the social brain across childhood and adolescence. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018;13(8):819-30. 63. Fox MD, Corbetta M, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Raichle ME. Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(26):10046-51. 64. Apperly IA, Samson D, Humphreys GW. Domain-specificity and theory of mind: evaluating neuropsychological evidence. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9(12):572-7. 65. Lombardo MV, Lai MC, Baron-Cohen S. Big data approaches to decomposing heterogeneity across the autism spectrum. Mol Psychiatry. 2019. 66. Glover GH, Mueller BA, Turner JA, van Erp TG, Liu TT, Greve DN, et al. Function biomedical informatics research network recommendations for prospective multicenter functional MRI studies. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36(1):39-54. 67. Wang AT, Lee SS, Sigman M, Dapretto M. Reading affect in the face and voice: neural correlates of interpreting communicative intent in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007; 64(6):698-708. 68. Lai MC, Lombardo MV, Chakrabarti B, Ruigrok AN, Bullmore ET, Suckling J, et al. Neural self-representation in autistic women and association with ‘compensatory camouflaging'. Autism. 2018;1362361318807159. 69. Hahamy A, Behrmann M, Malach R. The idiosyncratic brain: distortion of spontaneous connectivity patterns in autism spectrum disorder. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(2):302-9. 70. Muller RA, Shih P, Keehn B, Deyoe JR, Leyden KM, Shukla DK. Underconnected, but how? A survey of functional connectivity MRI studies in autism spectrum disorders. Cerebral Cortex. 2011;21(10):2233-43. 71. Thye MD, Bednarz HM, Herringshaw AJ, Sartin EB, Kana RK. The impact of atypical sensory processing on social impairments in autism spectrum disorder. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018;29:151-67. 72. Happe F, Cook JL, Bird G. The structure of social cognition: in(ter)dependence of sociocognitive processes. Ann Rev Psychol. 2017;68: 243-67. 73. Clements CC, Zoltowski AR, Yankowitz LD, Yerys BE, Schultz RT, Herrington JD. Evaluation of the social motivation hypothesis of autism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(8):797-808. 74. Kinnaird E, Stewart C, Tchanturia K. Investigating alexithymia in autism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Psychiatry. 2019;55:80-9. Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.