BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Presenting Preprints: Are Library Publishers the New Facebook?

    Eve, Martin Paul and Schiff, Lisa and Alperin, Juan Pablo and Caron, Bruce and Mendonça, Alex (2021) Presenting Preprints: Are Library Publishers the New Facebook? In: Library Publishing Forum, 10-13 May 2021, Online. (Unpublished)

    Full text not available from this repository.

    Abstract

    Preprints are an increasingly important component of the scholarly record and preprint platforms have correspondingly grown in number. Academic communities value preprints for the opportunity to share early findings with peers and receive immediate feedback on not-yet-reviewed works. With the COVID pandemic, a broader audience is turning to preprints, as political leaders, journalists, and the public seek new information about the virus. Complications arise, however, when the unvetted nature of these works is not clearly signaled alongside discussions of their findings. In late 2020, Rick Anderson captured these concerns, highlighting cases where discredited preprints remained available to read, presenting a potential for misinformation. Anderson posited that preprint platform providers, not just editors, should ensure adequate preprint vetting and be willing to retract them. With the availability of two new open-source preprint platforms–PKP’s Open Preprint Systems (OPS) and Birkbeck’s Janeway preprint server–library publishers now have familiar, robust infrastructure for entering this space and are a logical home for such services, especially given a strong commitment to a specific research community. But what additional responsibilities must we accept–if any–as publishers of this genre? Should we establish terms for vetting of submissions? Without adequate domain knowledge, how would we enforce, or even audit, such terms? How do we indicate that a specific preprint’s findings have not yet been formally accepted? What about obligations regarding debunked publications? What are the responsibilities of platform providers, publishers, and editors? Should library publishers, as a community of practice, expand on the proposed best practices related to preprint metadata to ensure we are responsible actors in providing access to early research? Panelists will explore these questions during the session’s first half, and invite attendee participation for the second. Registered attendees will receive an advance survey regarding current/planned preprint publishing, in order to identify additional discussion topics.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
    School: School of Arts > English, Theatre and Creative Writing
    Depositing User: Martin Eve
    Date Deposited: 13 May 2021 17:31
    Last Modified: 13 May 2021 17:31
    URI: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/44277

    Statistics

    Downloads
    Activity Overview
    0Downloads
    159Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item