BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Comparing typical opening move choices made by humans and chess engines

    Levene, Mark and Bar-Ilan, J. (2007) Comparing typical opening move choices made by humans and chess engines. The Computer Journal 50 (5), pp. 567-573. ISSN 0010-4620.

    Full text not available from this repository.

    Abstract

    The opening book is an important component of a chess engine, and thus computer chess programmers have been developing automated methods to improve the quality of their books. For chess, which has a very rich opening theory, large databases of high-quality games can be used as the basis of an opening book, from which statistics relating to move choices from given positions can be collected. In order to find out whether the opening books used by modern chess engines in machine versus machine competitions are ‘comparable’ to those used by chess players in human versus human competitions, we carried out analysis on 26 test positions using statistics from two opening books: one compiled from humans' games and the other from machines' games. Our analysis using several nonparametric measures shows that, overall, there is a strong association between humans' and machines' choices of opening moves when using a book to guide their choices.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Article
    School: School of Business, Economics & Informatics > Computer Science and Information Systems
    Depositing User: Sarah Hall
    Date Deposited: 25 May 2021 15:53
    Last Modified: 25 May 2021 15:53
    URI: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/44417

    Statistics

    Downloads
    Activity Overview
    0Downloads
    12Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item