Comparing typical opening move choices made by humans and chess engines

Levene, Mark and Bar-Ilan, J. (2006) Comparing typical opening move choices made by humans and chess engines. arXiv.

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0610060

Abstract

The opening book is an important component of a chess engine, and thus computer chess programmers have been developing automated methods to improve the quality of their books. For chess, which has a very rich opening theory, large databases of high-quality games can be used as the basis of an opening book, from which statistics relating to move choices from given positions can be collected. In order to find out whether the opening books used by modern chess engines in machine versus machine competitions are ``comparable'' to those used by chess players in human versus human competitions, we carried out analysis on 26 test positions using statistics from two opening books one compiled from humans' games and the other from machines' games. Our analysis using several nonparametric measures, shows that, overall, there is a strong association between humans' and machines' choices of opening moves when using a book to guide their choices.

Metadata

Item Type:	Other
School:	Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Science > School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences
Depositing User:	Sarah Hall
Date Deposited:	25 May 2021 19:39
Last Modified:	09 Aug 2023 12:51
URI:	https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/44433

Statistics

Archive Staff Only (login required)

Edit/View Item