Stoll, Timothy (2019) Nietzsche and Schiller on aesthetic semblance. The Monist 102 (3), pp. 331-348. ISSN 0026-9662.
Abstract
Nietzsche consistently valorizes artistic falsehoods. On standard interpretations, this is because art provides deceptive yet salutary fictions that help us affirm life. This reading conflicts, however, with Nietzsche’s insistence that life-affirmation requires untrammeled honesty. I present an alternative interpretation which navigates the interpretive impasse. With special attention to the influence of Friedrich Schiller, the paper argues for three claims: (1) Nietzsche does not hold that art is false because it “beautifies,” but because it produces mere semblances of, its objects; (2) these semblances are essentially non-deceptive; (3) he values artistic illusions because they dispose us positively to illusion more generally. Such ‘evaluative reorientation,’ I argue, is not merely consistent with, but integral to, achieving Nietzsche’s ideal of honesty.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Historical Studies |
Depositing User: | Tim Stoll |
Date Deposited: | 06 Oct 2021 16:05 |
Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 18:13 |
URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/46188 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.