BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Descartes on modality and the eternal truths

    Patterson, Sarah (2022) Descartes on modality and the eternal truths. Public Reason 14 (1), pp. 11-25. ISSN 2065-7285.

    [img] Text
    50056.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript
    Restricted to Repository staff only

    Download (312kB)
    [img]
    Preview
    Text
    50056a.pdf - Published Version of Record
    Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

    Download (202kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Descartes maintained that God freely created all eternal truths. Yet, while it is impossible for necessary truths to have been otherwise, if they are a matter of God’s free choice, then it seems that they could have been otherwise. Adrian W. Moore (2020) offers a solution to this conflict that, he claims, Descartes “could and should” have adopted. This article argues that Descartes’s position is in a sense closer to Moore’s solution than Moore permits, yet proposes an arguably more accurate account via the Cartesian relationship between omnipotence, indifference, and the dependence of the eternal truths on God. Omnipotence and indifference do not express that God might have created the necessary truths in another way, but rather that God’s decrees are in no way determined by anything other than God. Thus, alternative possibilities are not relevant to this account, since there were none before God’s creative act.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Article
    School: Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Historical Studies
    Depositing User: Sarah Patterson
    Date Deposited: 15 May 2024 15:39
    Last Modified: 16 May 2024 13:44
    URI: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/50056

    Statistics

    Activity Overview
    6 month trend
    0Downloads
    6 month trend
    0Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item