BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Approximative justice : dealing with differends and cross-border evidence in the EU

    Gonourie Waldenström, Anna Andrea Elisabeth (2022) Approximative justice : dealing with differends and cross-border evidence in the EU. PhD thesis, Birkbeck, University of London.

    [img] Text
    Anna G Waldenström Thesis Final.pdf - Full Version
    Restricted to Repository staff only until 15 January 2026.

    Download (1MB)

    Abstract

    This thesis is about approximative justice. Approximative justice appears in a judgment that the parties accept as subjectively just because they have been heard and treated fairly, and that at the end of the process, the person in the street would perceive as objectively correct. This distinguishes between justice as procedure and justice as result and proposes an understanding of justice as a legal symphonic arrangement of the constitutive parts of the case. With inspiration from Lyotard’s The Differend, evidence is understood as a language act, the sense of which depends on various conditions. As evidence is subsumed under the law, which is a normative human practice, a differend occurs. A comparative study of Swedish and French civil procedure shows the impact of the communicatory structure of judicial fact-finding on the sense of the evidence. It is also found that various purpose-points of the human practices of national law as well as evidence’s extra-legal environment likewise determine the sense of the evidence. When evidence is taken across borders these conditions constitute hinderances for evidence in its role in the formation of a just judgment. The party may therefore struggle to be heard and the judge struggle to know the case through the means of cross-border evidence. This puts critical light on EU’s ambitions to increase access to justice through swift cooperation between the Member States in cross-border taking of evidence. Approximative justice is a response to the relativity of facts, which make justice as the rational correct judgment on the basis of evidence unrealistic. The thesis thus concludes that the indeterminacy of evidence demands a conception of justice which allows for the approximative.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Thesis
    Copyright Holders: The copyright of this thesis rests with the author, who asserts his/her right to be known as such according to the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988. No dealing with the thesis contrary to the copyright or moral rights of the author is permitted.
    Depositing User: Acquisitions And Metadata
    Date Deposited: 11 Jan 2023 11:34
    Last Modified: 03 Jan 2024 11:51
    URI: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/50421
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18743/PUB.00050421

    Statistics

    Activity Overview
    6 month trend
    107Downloads
    6 month trend
    137Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item