BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    Sentencing riot-related offending: where do the public stand?

    Roberts, J.V. and Hough, Mike (2013) Sentencing riot-related offending: where do the public stand? British Journal of Criminology 53 (2), pp. 234-256. ISSN 0007-0955.

    Full text not available from this repository.

    Abstract

    This article examines public attitudes to the sentencing offences associated with the rioting which took place in England in August 2011. Findings are based on a nationally representative survey of adults. The study uses a randomized split-sample experimental design to compare sentencing preferences for actual offences committed during the riots with preferences for similar offences committed under normal circumstances. The riot sub-sample generally ‘sentenced’ more severely than the non-riot sub-sample, but much less severely than the courts. The majority also thought that a non-custodial sentence with a reparative element was an acceptable alternative to custody. These trends suggest an unusual divergence of perspectives between the community and the courts: although the public are generally critical of the courts for leniency, with respect to non-violent offending during the riots, the latter appear more punitive.

    Metadata

    Item Type: Article
    Keyword(s) / Subject(s): sentencing, riots, aggravation, public opinion
    School: School of Law
    Research Centres and Institutes: Crime & Justice Policy Research, Institute for
    Depositing User: Administrator
    Date Deposited: 26 Feb 2013 15:17
    Last Modified: 05 Dec 2016 16:23
    URI: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/6165

    Statistics

    Downloads
    Activity Overview
    0Downloads
    495Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item