Contested resources: unions, employers, and the adoption of new work practices in US and UK telecommunications
Ramirez, Matias and Guy, Frederick and Beale, David (2007) Contested resources: unions, employers, and the adoption of new work practices in US and UK telecommunications. British Journal of Industrial Relations 45 (3), pp. 495-517. ISSN 0007-1080.
|
Text
628.pdf Download (245kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The pattern of adoption of high-performance work practices has been explained in terms of strategic contingency and in terms of union presence. We compare the post-deregulation/privatization changes in work practice at AT&T, Bell Atlantic and British Telecom. On the basis of these cases, we argue that the choice of new work practices should be understood as a consequence not only of the company's resources or changes in its environment, nor of a simple union presence, but also as a consequence of the practices' effects on union power, the nature of the union's engagement, and the union's strategic choices.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Business and Law > Birkbeck Business School |
Research Centres and Institutes: | Innovation Management Research, Birkbeck Centre for |
Depositing User: | Administrator |
Date Deposited: | 12 Dec 2007 11:24 |
Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 16:47 |
URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/628 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.