BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online

    A collaborative approach to improving online assessment and feedback opportunities

    Havemann, Leo and Sherman, S. (2016) A collaborative approach to improving online assessment and feedback opportunities. In: ALT-C 2016: Association for Learning Technology conference: Connect, collaborate, create, 6-8 Sep 2016, Warwick, U.K.. (Unpublished)

    [img]
    Preview
    Slideshow
    ALT-C 2016- BEAF .pdf - Presentation

    Download (2MB) | Preview

    Abstract

    “Assessment and feedback lies at the heart of the learning experience, and forms a significant part of both academic and administrative workload. It remains however the single biggest source of student dissatisfaction with the higher education experience” (Ferrell, 2012). In recent years, UK agencies such as Jisc (2010), NUS (2010, 2011) and the HEA (2012) have dedicated time and resources to researching and supporting the enhancement of assessment and feedback. The NUS has argued that institutions must consider ways of making university administration more accessible through technology including online submission of assessment (NUS, 2010), and that the use of technology in institutional administration will simplify and improve processes, including assessment and feedback (NUS, 2011). For Jisc (2010), a holistic approach which considers the technical, administrative and pedagogic elements of assessment and feedback is necessary. The HEA’s 2012 paper “A Marked Improvement” presents a strong pedagogic argument for updating and transforming assessment methods in higher education. The paper concludes that “it is clear that there is need for institutions to continue to adopt robust technological solutions to support assessment and feedback” since it has an impact on both supporting administrative processes, and moreover in influencing the student experience (HEA, 2012). It is evident that online assessment and feedback methods and processes are increasingly essential to the student experience and must be regarded as a priority for education institutions. This session considers the experiences of the members of the Bloomsbury Learning Environment (BLE) consortium (a group of geographically-close HE institutions based in London) in which there has been an increasing interest – and concern – in this area. For example, low scores in the National Student Survey relating to feedback (common across the sector) provided a driver to place greater attention on improving assessment mechanisms (technology, process and quality). Learning technologies play an important role in offering efficient, accessible ways of managing assessment and providing feedback but the affordances of specific technologies can also constrain practice. This presentation describes a cross-institutional project conducted by members of the BLE, which aimed to explore and improve online assessment and feedback processes, practices, opportunities and technologies available to the member institutions. In the project, we sought to identify the expectations and goals of key stakeholders regarding the deployment and use of e-assessment and feedback (for example academic administrators, teaching staff and learning technologists). We assessed and evaluated appropriate technologies to support e-assessment across the consortium, producing documentation and case studies. We also arranged practice-sharing and CPD events for academic and support staff. By working collaboratively, we aimed to facilitate a collective sharing of knowledge, expertise and resourcing to ensure the individual partners could learn from each other and improve practice. The presentation will report and comment on the approaches taken to disseminate lessons learned and highlight areas of good, innovative and interesting practice. We will also discuss the question of impact: some projects are implemented with very specific, quantifiable targets in mind. In terms of the more pedagogic aspects of this project, there is less evidence to go on. When evaluating a collaborative project of such wide scope, understanding how to identify and quantify improved practice is an ongoing challenge. References Ferrell, G (2012) A view of the Assessment and Feedback Landscape: baseline analysis of policy and practice from the JISC Assessment and Feedback programme. JISC. (2010) Effective Assessment in a Digital Age: A guide to technology-enhanced assessment and feedback [online], Bristol, HEFCE. Available: www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearning/digiassass_eada.pdf HEA (2012). A Marked Improvement. Available: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resource/marked-improvement NUS (2010) Student Perspectives on Technology. Available: https://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2010/rd1810/rd18_10.pdf NUS (2011) NUS Charter on Technology in Higher Education. Available: https://www.ucisa.ac.uk/~/media/Files/about/news/2012/ICT_Charter_Final1.ashx

    Metadata

    Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
    School: Central Administration Departments > IT Services
    Depositing User: Leo Havemann
    Date Deposited: 07 Oct 2016 14:40
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2016 14:40
    URI: http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/16102

    Statistics

    Downloads
    Activity Overview
    1,213Downloads
    140Hits

    Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.

    Archive Staff Only (login required)

    Edit/View Item Edit/View Item