Northcott, Robert (2015) Opinion polling and election predictions. Philosophy of Science 82 (5), pp. 1260-1271. ISSN 0031-8248.
![[img]](https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Polling-PSA.214.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript Restricted to Repository staff only Download (160kB) |
|
|
Text
10719.pdf - Published Version of Record Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Election prediction by means of opinion polling is a rare empirical success story for social science, but one not previously considered by philosophers. I examine the details of a prominent case, namely the 2012 US presidential election, and draw two lessons of more general interest: 1) Methodology over metaphysics. Traditional metaphysical criteria were not a useful guide to whether successful prediction would be possible; instead, the crucial thing was selecting an effective methodology. 2) Which methodology? Success required sophisticated use of case-specific evidence from opinion polling. The pursuit of explanations via general theory or causal mechanisms, by contrast, turned out to be precisely the wrong path – contrary to much recent philosophy of social science.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Historical Studies |
| Depositing User: | Robert Northcott |
| Date Deposited: | 06 Nov 2015 13:49 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 17:13 |
| URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/10719 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.
Archive Staff Only (login required)
