Walsh, C.R. and Hahn, Ulrike and DeGregorio, L. (2009) Severe outcomes and their influence on judgments of causation. In: Taatgen, N. and van Rijn, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, Texas, USA: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 550-554. ISBN 9780976831853.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to examine whether the nature of an outcome influences attributions of causation. We contrast two theories of how people make causal judgments. Counterfactual theories assume that c causes e if a change to c would have brought about a change to e. In contrast, generative theories propose that causation occurs if there is a causal process linking c and e. Both theories share the assumption that judgments of whether an event causes an outcome should be independent of the nature of that outcome. We describe an experiment showing that people give higher ratings of causation to a severe than a neutral outcome when there is no causal process linking the action and the outcome. Individuals seek causal explanations for a severe outcome more than a neutral one and when an analysis of the mechanisms fails to provide one, they are more likely to rely on a counterfactual analysis to deliver one.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Book Section |
|---|---|
| Keyword(s) / Subject(s): | causation, counterfactuals, mechanisms |
| School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Science > School of Psychological Sciences |
| Research Centres and Institutes: | Birkbeck Knowledge Lab |
| Depositing User: | Sarah Hall |
| Date Deposited: | 18 Jun 2015 14:46 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 17:17 |
| URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/12380 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.
Archive Staff Only (login required)
