Newman, Julian Epistemic opacity, confirmation holism and technical debt: computer simulation in the light of empirical software engineering. In: HaPoC 2015: 3rd International Conference on the History and Philosophy of Computing, 8-11 Oct 2015, Pisa, Italy. (Unpublished)
|
Text
12921.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript Download (188kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Epistemic opacity vis a vis human agents has been presented as an essential, ineliminable characteristic of computer simulation models resulting from the characteristics of the human cognitive agent. This paper argues, on the contrary, that such epistemic opacity as does occur in computer simulations is not a consequence of human limitations but of a failure on the part of model developers to adopt good software engineering practice for managing human error and ensuring the software artefact is maintainable. One consequence of such failures is to create a “technical debt” which manifests itself in the so-called novel confirmation holism confronted by complex systems models. The argument from the supposed essential epistemic opacity of computational science to a non-anthropocentric epistemology runs counter to best practice in software engineering and overlooks empirical results of software engineering science.
Metadata
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
---|---|
School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Historical Studies |
Depositing User: | Administrator |
Date Deposited: | 08 Sep 2015 11:14 |
Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 17:18 |
URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/12921 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.