El-Enany, Nadine (2015) Ferguson and the politics of policing radical protest. Law and Critique 26 (1), pp. 3-6. ISSN 0957-8536.
Abstract
While the norm amongst states seeking to repress protest movements which challenge their legitimacy is to resort to the ideology of the criminal law and allegations of violence against protesters as a means of depoliticising their activity there have been times when this method has appeared to those in power to be inadequate as a means of weakening or crushing a particular movement. The Ferguson protests in the summer of 2014 were initially met with police repression, but ultimately the National Guard was called in to respond to the protests, which were presented as being orchestrated by “outsiders”. In this way, the protests were re-politicsed for the purposes of justifying the deployment of the military against the people. This justification is antithetical to the notion and purpose of protest such as that in Ferguson, which is to be regarded as successful precisely in its having generated a broad movement that individuals and groups from across US states were moved to join.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Keyword(s) / Subject(s): | Ferguson, protest, national guard, US, policing, military |
| School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Business and Law > Birkbeck Law School |
| Depositing User: | Sarah Hall |
| Date Deposited: | 10 Mar 2016 17:08 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 17:22 |
| URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/14670 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.
Archive Staff Only (login required)
