Oaksford, Mike (2000) Speed, frugality, and the empirical basis of Take-The-Best. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5), pp. 760-761. ISSN 0140-525X.
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral...
Abstract
This commentary questions the claim that Take-The-Best provides a cognitively more plausible account of cue utilisation in decision making because it is faster and more frugal than alternative algorithms. It is also argued that the experimental evidence for Take-The-Best, or non-integrative algorithms, is weak and appears consistent with people normally adopting an integrative approach to cue utilisation.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Science > School of Psychological Sciences |
Depositing User: | Administrator |
Date Deposited: | 20 Sep 2016 10:24 |
Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 17:26 |
URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/16109 |
Statistics
Downloads
Activity Overview
6 month trend
6 month trend
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.