James, Susan (2016) Why should we read Spinoza? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 78 , pp. 109-125. ISSN 1358-2461.
![[img]](https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
RIP paper on Spinoza.pdf - Published Version of Record Restricted to Repository staff only Download (247kB) |
Abstract
Historians of philosophy are well aware of the limitations of what Butterfield called ‘Whig history’: narratives of historical progress that culminate in an enlightened present. Yet many recent studies retain something of this teleological outlook. Why should this be? To explain it, I propose, we need to take account of the emotional investments that guide our interest in the philosophical past, and the role they play in shaping what we understand as the history of philosophy. As far as I know, this problem is not currently much addressed, but it is illuminatingly explored in the work of Spinoza (1632-77). He aspires to explain the psychological basis of our attachment to histories with a teleological flavour. At the same time, he insists that such histories are epistemologically flawed. To study the history of philosophy in a properly philosophical fashion we must overcome our own Whiggish leanings.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Historical Studies |
| Depositing User: | Susan James |
| Date Deposited: | 15 Feb 2017 10:44 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 17:31 |
| URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/18070 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.
Archive Staff Only (login required)
