Heard, Catherine (2015) Community sentences since 2000: How they work – and why they have not cut prisoner numbers. Technical Report. Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, London, UK.
This is the latest version of this item.
![[img]](https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (Research and policy report)
CCJS_ACE_Rep_Sept15_ONLINE FINAL3.pdf - Published Version of Record Download (573kB) |
Abstract
This research report reviews the range of alternatives to custody across the UK, from bail, through community sanctions and probation, to early release from prison. It contains detailed statistical and qualitative information on the available alternatives to custody and their use since 2000. The report was produced as part of an EU funded study comparing alternatives to custody in 8 EU member states.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Monograph (Technical Report) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | ISBN: 9781906003432 |
| School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Social Sciences |
| Research Centres and Institutes: | Crime & Justice Policy Research, Institute for |
| Depositing User: | Catherine Heard |
| Date Deposited: | 29 Sep 2017 13:15 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 17:35 |
| URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/19789 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Community sentences since 2000: How they work – and why they have not cut prisoner numbers. (deposited 29 Sep 2017 13:15) [Currently Displayed]
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.
Archive Staff Only (login required)
