Hodson, Dermot and Puetter, U. (2017) Studying Europe after the fall: four thoughts on post-EU studies. Journal of European Public Policy 25 (3), pp. 465-474. ISSN 1350-1763.
![[img]](https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
20182.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript Restricted to Repository staff only Download (636kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
What would European Union (EU) scholars study if the EU were to fall? This contribution does not predict the demise of the Union but rather engages EU scholars in a thought-experiment. It considers what would happen to EU studies and the scholarly community if the EU were to disintegrate. The possible contours of a post-EU studies are also outlined. The discussion is based around the four ideas of destruction, diagnosis, diversion and renewal. If the EU were to fall, it argues, the questions that drive EU scholars would endure and evolve rather than evaporate. The very challenges that triggered the collapse of the EU would be likely to haunt former member states and other organizational structures for regional and international co-operation.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis, available online at the link above. |
| Keyword(s) / Subject(s): | European Union, EU studies, disintegration, integration theory |
| School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Social Sciences |
| Depositing User: | Dermot Hodson |
| Date Deposited: | 30 Oct 2017 15:54 |
| Last Modified: | 23 Jun 2025 14:10 |
| URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/20182 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.
Archive Staff Only (login required)
