Topp, Leslie (2018) Single rooms, seclusion and the non-restraint movement in Britain, 1838-1844. Social History of Medicine 31 (4), pp. 754-773. ISSN 0951-631X.
Text
20899.pdf - Author's Accepted Manuscript Restricted to Repository staff only Download (475kB) | Request a copy |
||
|
Text
20899A.pdf - Published Version of Record Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (148kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article shows how the practice of seclusion – the confinement of asylum patients in locked rooms alone – entered the spotlight during the bitter controversy over the abolition of mechanical restraints in the late 1830s and early 1840s. Drawing on letters to The Lancet, as well as on asylum reports, reports of the Commissioners in Lunacy and polemical pamphlets, and focusing on the two asylums at the centre of the controversy, Lincoln and Hanwell, I set out the range of positions taken, from pro-restraint and anti-seclusion to anti-restraint and pro-seclusion. I show how seclusion was associated with a lack of transparency, how it was seen as parallel to the disputed practice of solitary confinement in the prison system, and how both the practice of seclusion and the single room itself were modified in the face of these challenges. John Conolly emerges as the most committed proponent of seclusion.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication following peer review. The version of record is available online at the link above. |
Keyword(s) / Subject(s): | lunatic asylums, seclusion, non-restraint movement, Lincoln Asylum, Hanwell Asylum, John Conolly, Robert Gardiner Hill |
School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Historical Studies |
Research Centres and Institutes: | Architecture, Space and Society, Centre for |
Depositing User: | Leslie Topp |
Date Deposited: | 23 Jan 2018 11:45 |
Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 17:38 |
URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/20899 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.