Grzankowski, Alex (2015) Not all attitudes are propositional. European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3), pp. 374-391. ISSN 0966-8373.
Text
21873.pdf - Published Version of Record Restricted to Repository staff only Download (157kB) |
Abstract
Most contemporary philosophical discussions of intentionality start and end with a treatment of the propositional attitudes. In fact, many theorists hold (tacitly if not explicitly) that all attitudes are propositional attitudes. Our folk‐psychological ascriptions suggest, however, that there are non‐propositional attitudes: I like Sally, my brother fears snakes, everyone loves my grandmother, and Rush Limbaugh hates Obama. I argue that things are as they appear: there are non‐propositional attitudes. More specifically, I argue that there are attitudes that relate individuals to non‐propositional objects and do so not in virtue of relating them to propositions. I reach this conclusion by not only showing that attempted analyses of apparently non‐propositional attitudes in terms of the propositional fail, but that some non‐propositional attitudes don't even supervene on propositional attitudes. If this is correct, then the common discussions of intentionality that address only propositional attitudes are incomplete and those who hold that all intentional states are propositional are mistaken.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
School: | Birkbeck Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > School of Historical Studies |
Depositing User: | Administrator |
Date Deposited: | 26 Mar 2018 07:35 |
Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2023 17:40 |
URI: | https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/21873 |
Statistics
Additional statistics are available via IRStats2.